Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Rev. chil. neuro-psiquiatr ; 59(2): 91-101, jun. 2021. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1388388

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: Las personas con enfermedades mentales con frecuencia experimentan estigma por parte de profesionales de la salud, por lo que es necesario disponer de instrumentos para evaluar el estigma e implementar acciones para reducirlo. Este manuscrito describe el proceso de traducción y validación de contenido en Chile del instrumento Opening Minds Scale for Healthcare Practitioners (OMS-HC), para la evaluación del estigma en profesionales de la salud hacia personas con enfermedad mental desarrollado originalmente en Canadá. MÉTODO: Se realizó la traducción y análisis de validación de contenido, incluyendo etapas de traducción inglés-castellano y traducción inversa por traductora profesional, triangulación, y finalmente consulta a expertos para evaluación de validez de contenido según Índice de Validez de Contenido (IVC) con 10 expertos de investigación, academia, y experto por experiencia en salud mental. Se consideró aceptables ítems con IVC entre 0,51-0,99. RESULTADOS: Del total de 20 ítems del cuestionario, dos fueron evaluados con IVC menor al establecido, relacionados con constructos "hope" y "compassion", propios del marco teórico-modelo de Recovery, base del instrumento. Los dos ítems fueron re-evaluados con autores originales para adaptarlos procurando fidelidad al constructo, en un proceso iterativo con expertos. CONCLUSIONES: Se presenta la traducción del instrumento Opening Minds Scale for Healthcare Practitioners (OMS-HC) adaptado al castellano y con análisis de su validación de contenido, consistente de 20 ítems para evaluación del estigma hacia personas con enfermedades mentales en profesionales de la salud, posibilitando nuevos estudios que analicen su validez de criterio, y la exploración de su utilidad a nivel local.


INTRODUCTION: People with mental illnesses frequently experience stigma from health care professionals, which is why it is an urge to count with adequate assessments to evaluate stigma to address it. This manuscript describes the process of language translation and content validation in Chile of the Opening Minds Scale for the assessment of stigma against people with mental illnesses in Healthcare Practitioners (WHO-HC), originally developed in Canada. METHODS: Language translation and content validation analysis were performed, including English-Spanish translation and reverse translation by professional translator, item triangulation by researchers, and content validity analysis of the translated questionnaire by expert evaluation based on the Content Validity Index (CVI), including 10 experts in academia, research, and one expert by experience. Items rated with CVI 0.51-0.99 were considered acceptable. RESULTS: From the total of 20 items of the questionnaire, two were rated with lower CVI than acceptable, specifically related to the constructs "hope" and "compassion", part of the theoretical framework of Recovery in which the questionnaire is based on. The two items were re-evaluated including original authors to adapt them seeking fidelity to the foundational constructs, through an iterative process with experts. CONCLUSIONS: The translation of the Opening Minds Scale for Healthcare Practitioners (WHO-HC) is presented, adapted to Spanish in Chile after content analysis, consisting of 20 items for the evaluation of stigma towards people with mental illness in health professionals, enabling the development of new studies to analyze criterion validity, and the exploration of feasibility and utility at the local level.


Subject(s)
Humans , Attitude of Health Personnel , Mental Disorders , Professional-Patient Relations , Translating , Mental Health , Surveys and Questionnaires , Reproducibility of Results , Health Personnel/psychology , Social Stigma
2.
Rev. chil. ter. ocup ; (7): 76-82, nov. 2007.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-526872

ABSTRACT

En el proceso de construcción teórica, al que se ha dedicado el Comité de Ciencia de la Ocupación, se ha hecho necesaria una aproximación a conceptos, ya definidos por la Ciencia Ocupacional con una visión que provea identidad al grupo de investigadores, por sobre los elementos de universalidad que se han usado previamente. Si bien todo proceso de generación de conocimiento debe considerar la investigación, este comité comenzó su trabajo de desarrollo teórico a través de una construcción colectiva, basada en lectura y análisis profundo. El presente ensayo refleja ese proceso colectivo.


In the process of theoretical construction, on which the Committee of Occupational Science (of the School of Occupational Therapy of University of Chile) has been devoted, it was needed an approach to concepts, already defined by Occupational Science, from a view that provides identity to this recent group of study and research. Even though generation of knowledge requires research, this committee began its work of theoretical development through a collective construction; reading and discussion based. The present essay reflects that collective process, and the authors took the task of giving to it the written form.


Subject(s)
Humans , Concept Formation , Occupational Therapy , Occupations , Terminology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL